Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 14 results ...

Abudayyeh, O (2003) Undergraduate Research Mentoring Model in Construction Engineering and Management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(01), 65–69.

Bakatjan, S, Arikan, M and Tiong, R L K (2003) Optimal Capital Structure Model for BOT Power Projects in Turkey. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(01), 89–97.

Cheng, M and Tsai, M (2003) Reengineering of Construction Management Process. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(01), 105–14.

Cheng, M, Su, C and You, H (2003) Optimal Project Organizational Structure for Construction Management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(01), 70–79.

Colwell, D A F and Ariaratnam, S T (2003) Evaluation of High-Density Polyethylene Pipe Installed Using Horizontal Directional Drilling. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(01), 47–55.

Gambatese, J A (2003) Controlled Concrete Demolition Using Expansive Cracking Agents. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(01), 98–104.

Ho, S P and Liu, L Y (2003) How to Evaluate and Invest in Emerging A/E/C Technologies under Uncertainty. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(01), 16–24.

Lee, J, Lorenc, S J and Bernold, L E (2003) Comparative Performance Evaluation of Tele-Operated Pipe Laying. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(01), 32–40.

Mattila, K G and Park, A (2003) Comparison of Linear Scheduling Model and Repetitive Scheduling Method. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(01), 56–64.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: Scheduling; Models; Construction; construction industry; scheduling; modelling; civil engineering;
  • ISBN/ISSN: 0733-9364
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2003)129:1(56)
  • Abstract:
    Various linear scheduling techniques have been proposed over the years. The limitations on these techniques have been the inability to determine critical activities. Contractors and departments of transportation have identified this need. Recently two different methods have been proposed—the linear scheduling model and the repetitive scheduling method. This paper discusses basic linear scheduling techniques and then the calculation of critical activities of basic linear scheduling elements using the two methods. The results of the two techniques are compared.

Minchin, R E and Thomas, H R (2003) Validation of Vibration-Based Onboard Asphalt Density Measuring System. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(01), 1–7.

Mohamed, S (2003) Scorecard Approach to Benchmarking Organizational Safety Culture in Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(01), 80–88.

Park, K, Hwang, Y, Seo, S and Seo, H (2003) Quantitative Assessment of Environmental Impacts on Life Cycle of Highways. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(01), 25–31.

Pavitt, T C and Gibb, A G F (2003) Interface Management within Construction: In Particular, Building Facade. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(01), 8–15.

Rojas, E M and Aramvareekul, P (2003) Is Construction Labor Productivity Really Declining?. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(01), 41–46.